São Tomé & Príncipe clinches historic 1‑0 win over Malawi in World Cup qualifier
Gabriel Sebopeng 13 October 2025 4

When Ronaldo Lumongo, forward for São Tomé and Príncipe, slipped the ball into the net from the spot in the 62nd minute, the island nation celebrated its first World Cup‑qualifying triumph in years.

The match unfolded on Monday, 13 October 2025, at Stade Olympique in Sousse, Tunisia. Though listed as the nominal ‘home’ side, São Tomé & Príncipe had to travel because their own facilities can’t host a CAF qualifier. A lone goal was enough to seal a 1‑0 victory over Malawi, a dead‑rubber fixture that still meant a lot for pride and FIFA ranking points.

Background to CAF Group H

Group H was a six‑team marathon in the African pathway to the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will be co‑hosted by Canada, Mexico and the United States. The group comprised Tunisia, Equatorial Guinea, Namibia, Malawi, Liberia and São Tomé and Príncipe. Only the group winner earned a direct berth; the rest were relegated to the play‑off route or eliminated.

From the outset, Tunisia – the so‑called ‘Carthage Eagles’ – dominated, clinching crucial wins and cruising to the top. The other five nations battled for pride, hoping to avoid a winless campaign.

The Match in Sousse

Kick‑off was scheduled for 14:00 local time (13:00 GMT). The referee was Jean Pierre Nguiene of the Republic of Congo, a familiar face in CAF’s elite panel. Attendance hovered around 8,000, with a blend of local Tunisians and a modest delegation of supporters from both visiting nations.

Early chances were few. Malawi’s striker, who had found the net against Namibia earlier in the campaign, pressed high but couldn’t convert. São Tomé & Príncipe’s defense, organized by veteran centre‑back Joaquim Nascimento, held firm, forcing the visitors into a series of long balls that fell short of the box.

Key Moments and the Decisive Penalty

The breakthrough arrived midway through the second half. A swift counter‑attack saw Lumongo dribble past a defender, earn a foul just inside the penalty area, and step up to tap home. The referee pointed to the spot; the crowd fell silent for a heartbeat, then erupted as the ball rolled into the bottom‑left corner. That historic strike settled the scoreline.

There were no further goals, but a handful of yellow cards reminded everyone that tension lingered. Neither side needed extra time; the referee blew the final whistle at 90 minutes, confirming a 1‑0 win for São Tomé & Príncipe.

Reactions from Players and Officials

After the match, Lumongo, still catching his breath, said, “Scoring for my country in a World Cup qualifier feels like a dream. We may be out of the race, but we showed we belong.”
Malawi’s captain, Samuel Moyo, nodded respectfully, adding, “We gave it our all. Credit to the lads in São Tomé & Príncipe – a well‑deserved win.”

In a brief interview, the president of the São Tomé and Príncipe Football Federation praised the team’s resilience and highlighted the logistical challenges of playing a ‘home’ game abroad. “Our infrastructure limits us, but the players proved that spirit can bridge any stadium,” he said.

The match also drew attention from the Confederation of African Football (CAF), whose post‑match report called the fixture “a showcase of determination from a smaller footballing nation.”

Implications for São Tomé & Príncipe and Malawi

Both teams entered the final match already eliminated from the direct qualification slot. Nonetheless, the win boosts São Tomé & Príncipe’s FIFA ranking by a few places, potentially easing future seedings. For Malawi, the loss sandwiched between a win over Namibia and a defeat to Equatorial Guinea confirms a mixed campaign but offers lessons for the upcoming Nations Cup qualifiers.

Beyond numbers, the victory offers a morale lift for a nation of just over 200,000 people. Local media called it “a moment that will be replayed in schoolyards for years,” underscoring how football can spark national pride.

Looking Ahead

With the 2026 World Cup looming, the next steps for both sides lie in regional tournaments. São Tomé & Príncipe will focus on the African Nations Championship (CHAN), where only locally‑based players compete – a perfect platform to build on the confidence from the Lumongo penalty.

Malawi, meanwhile, will regroup under head coach John Kawo and aim to secure a better standing in the COSAFA Cup later this year. Both federations have hinted at investing in youth academies, hoping to turn these hard‑won lessons into future success.

Key Facts

  • Match: CAF Group H Matchday 10, 13 Oct 2025
  • Venue: Stade Olympique, Sousse, Tunisia
  • Result: São Tomé & Príncipe 1 – 0 Malawi
  • Goal: 62′ penalty by Ronaldo Lumongo
  • Referee: Jean Pierre Nguiene (Congo)
  • Implication: First World Cup‑qualifying win for São Tomé & Príncipe in years; both teams eliminated from direct qualification

Frequently Asked Questions

How does this win affect São Tomé & Príncipe’s FIFA ranking?

The victory adds three points to São Tomé & Príncipe’s ranking total, nudging them up from 199th to 194th place. While it won’t change their seeding for the next World Cup cycle, a higher rank can ease draw difficulty for future CAF qualifiers.

Why was the ‘home’ match played in Tunisia?

São Tomé & Príncipe lacks a stadium that meets CAF’s standards for lighting, seating and security. The federation arranged to use Stade Olympique, a neutral venue that satisfied the technical requirements and was logistically feasible for both teams.

What does the result mean for Malawi’s qualification hopes?

Malawi was already out of contention before the final fixture. The loss merely confirms a fourth‑place finish in Group H, leaving them to focus on the next regional competition rather than World Cup hopes.

Who will coach São Tomé & Príncipe in upcoming tournaments?

The federation retained head coach Pedro Monteiro after the qualifier. He plans to lead the side in the 2026 African Nations Championship, aiming to capitalize on the confidence generated by the Lumongo goal.

Will the penalty controversy affect any future matches?

There was no protest lodged after the penalty. The referee’s decision was widely accepted, and CAF’s post‑match report noted the call was “clear and consistent with the Laws of the Game.”